NextREVIEW · Sci-fi thriller · AI & accountability
Companion (2025): When artificial love meets human control
When artificial love meets human control.
What happens when someone can adjust your intelligence, control your emotions, and switch you off when you disagree?
Nakakatakot ang idea. But the deeper question is about power: What happens when someone believes that having control gives them the right to do anything?
COMPANION brings that question into a disturbing mix of science fiction, dark comedy, and survival horror.
⚠️ Premise spoilers ahead. The ending stays unrevealed.
The story
Iris joins her boyfriend Josh and his friends for a weekend at a secluded lake house. What begins as a romantic getaway turns violent—and exposes a secret behind their relationship.
Iris is a companion robot. Her settings, including her intelligence and emotional responses, can be controlled through Josh’s phone.
As she discovers how she has been manipulated, the weekend becomes a struggle for survival and independence.
Written and directed by Drew Hancock, the film uses its futuristic premise to explore very recognizable problems: possessiveness, deception, and abuse disguised as affection. Story reference (includes full-film spoilers).
The cast
- Sophie Thatcher — Iris
- Jack Quaid — Josh
- Lukas Gage — Patrick
- Megan Suri — Kat
- Harvey Guillén — Eli
- Rupert Friend — Sergey
Thatcher’s Iris gives the story its emotional center, while Quaid’s Josh brings the unsettling contrast between apparent affection and a desire for control. Cast reference.
What the reviews say
As checked on September 18, 2026, Rotten Tomatoes lists 93% critics’ approval and 88% verified audience approval.
Its critics’ consensus praises the film’s clever construction and its ability to deliver more than plot twists. Those percentages measure approval; they are different from a personal score out of ten and can change over time. Rotten Tomatoes.
A line that reveals the power imbalance
“Iris, go to sleep.”
— Josh (Jack Quaid)
In context, this is a shutdown command. It makes the relationship’s imbalance unmistakable: one person can end the conversation by switching the other off. Scene reference (includes full-film spoilers).
For human relationships, the reflection is uncomfortable: Are we willing to listen when another person’s voice challenges our wishes?
Why this feels timely in the age of AI
With warnings about increasingly powerful AI, it is understandable to connect COMPANION with fears of machines killing people before this decade ends.
But we need to distinguish fiction, plausible risks, and established evidence.
The International AI Safety Report 2026 examines serious concerns involving malicious use, system failures, and potential loss of control. It also emphasizes uncertainty about how quickly capabilities will develop and what future outcomes will follow. It does not establish an inevitable “AI will kill humanity by 2030” timeline. International AI Safety Report 2026.
COMPANION offers a useful starting point for that conversation. Its violence is deeply connected to human manipulation and the removal of safeguards.
The practical question is: Who can change a system’s behavior, what prevents harmful use, and who remains accountable?
Hindi kailangang hintayin ang 2030 para seryosohin ang responsible AI.
What I took from it
1. Control is not proof of love.
A relationship becomes unhealthy when one person expects obedience and treats disagreement as a defect.
Real relationships require room for boundaries, honesty, and choices we may not like.
2. Intelligence does not guarantee integrity.
A person can be technically capable and morally irresponsible. In business, knowing how to build or deploy something must come with the discipline to consider its consequences.
3. Safeguards matter most when someone wants to bypass them.
Protection should hold up under misuse. For leaders adopting AI, that means asking who has access, what changes require approval, and how harmful behavior will be detected.
4. Personalization deserves scrutiny.
The film takes “made just for you” to a disturbing extreme. As marketers and users, we should examine whether personalization serves people’s needs or exploits their vulnerabilities.
5. Accountability cannot end with “the system did it.”
Developers, owners, operators, and decision-makers each have responsibilities. Delegating a task to technology does not erase our duty to the people affected.
From a human and leadership POV
The film’s relationship metaphor applies beyond romance.
A workplace where people cannot question decisions, raise concerns, or refuse unreasonable demands has a problem with power.
For leaders, a useful test is this: Can someone disagree with me without fearing punishment?
From a Christian POV
Genesis 1:27 grounds human dignity in being made in God’s image. That shapes how I believe we should treat people: with respect that does not depend on their usefulness or willingness to obey.
And 1 Corinthians 13:5 reminds us that love is not self-seeking.
These passages speak to our responsibilities toward people; they do not settle questions about fictional robots or machine consciousness.
My reflection is simple: the desire for convenience must never become an excuse to manipulate another person.
Ang tunay na malasakit ay may paggalang sa dignidad at kalayaan ng kapwa.
The Sir Next take
COMPANION uses an artificial relationship to expose human failures that already deserve our attention.
Its strongest discussion points are about consent, responsibility, and what people do when they hold power over others.
As we build and adopt more capable technology, our standards for accountability need to grow with it.
NextREVIEW verdict: 8/10
A sharp, unsettling sci-fi thriller with dark humor and meaningful questions about control. Sophie Thatcher and Jack Quaid anchor a story whose relationship commentary gives its technology premise weight.
Some developments rely on familiar thriller conventions, and its fictional robotics should not be treated as a technical forecast. Still, it offers plenty to discuss after the suspense ends.
For mature audiences: strong violence, sexual content, and strong language. Film details.
As AI becomes more capable and personal, what decisions should always require human judgment and accountability?
— Sir Next
Good stories spark better thinking.
#NextREVIEW #SirNext #CompanionMovie #ResponsibleAI #Leadership
What did you think?
React anonymously. No sign-in needed.
Loading reactions…
Share on Facebook